The problem from my perspective was extensions and interpretations of
the HTML standard by Microsoft making IE less compatible. Microsoft
knew that corporate networks would support IE and intentionally erode
competitor's market share. Microsoft in the '90s was ruthless and
should have been broken up.
As much as we love Linux, there are "too many" variations for it to take hold. It does well in the server arena, but not the desktop. And Mac, as good as it is missed the mark.Just recently I saw a conference by Linus Torvalds where he pointed out just that. That MS was succesful because there's only 1 Windows in each cycle, whereas in Linux, each app creator has to release an immense amount of binaries to have their app ready to be used in a myriad of different distros. The Cathedral and the Bazaar, back for blood... Still, Mr. Torvalds pointed out that is yet another huge corporation one that could push this culture and logic into the linux sphere, when Steam would have to standarize binary releases for games compatible with the linux platform
Think about this. Once Microsoft established itself as the OS of choice for IBM and the clones, it already created a foothold. Commodore, Atari, and other platforms just could not compete with the common platform that software was being created for.
--Matt
On this last piece of your post: MS didn't "establish itself"... they d some kind of shady move with IBM to have their OS pre-installed in OEM computers for a good few years, until it was irreversible. I know ameri folks (coming from "the land of opportunity and the free and brave), se these 'corporate moves' as not so much as "shady", but you gotta give t that's not quite "squeaky clean"...No doubt that MS did some shady stuff to get DOS on the IBM. They have
born in the 80's but have been getting back into retro computers again,
i miss the times when this was primary means of comms.
I grew up with dial-up in the 90s and 2000s, but never saw or used a BBS until last year. Using one now has changed my apprecation for using the Internet, and has changed my ideas on how to use it to communicate.
i was born in 1991! this is a cooler way to talk! :D
--mary4 (Victoria Crenshaw) the 286 enthusiast
... Radioactive cats have 18 half-lives
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/24 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Datanet BBS | telnet://datanetbbs.net:23 (21:1/166)
i was born in 1991! this is a cooler way to talk! :D
--mary4 (Victoria Crenshaw) the 286 enthusiast
... Radioactive cats have 18 half-lives
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/24 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Datanet BBS | telnet://datanetbbs.net:23 (21:1/166)
I have always thought so.same here! this is so much better than fb.
same here! this is so much better than fb.i was born in 1991! this is a cooler way to talk! :D
Nightfox wrote to Malvinas <=-
Yea, my reply was about that other guy saying that pretty much 'over night', users vaporized into thin air... I thought not seeing that happen here might've been a 'regional' thing... you say it was pretty similar in the US too...
Yeah.. I was surprised he also said he thought about 90% of BBSes had disappeared in 1993, which seems pretty early to me. The BBS scene was still fairly big here, I think until about 1997 or so when I noticed
users started to dwindle fairly fast. I didn't even know about the internet in 1993, and I'm not entirely sure how many people did.
Nightfox wrote to TheNerd <=-
I don't remember having such a problem with Netscape. It always seemed like a good browser.
TheNerd wrote to Nightfox <=-
I started using the internet in 1995 with Windows 3.1 and Winsock. I don't think it was a PITA.. It actually seemed fairly easy to set up. You'd just configure Winsock for your ISP and dial in, and you were online. I did that for a while until in 1996, I got my first job and spent my first couple paychecks on parts for a new PC, which I installed Windows 95 on.
OH gawd I hated Winsock. Early in my career I had to support that for
an ISP.. thankfully not for long before it filtered out of the system. Nothing but pain with a 'user' on the other end of the phone.
Malvinas wrote to Mhansel739 <=-
On this last piece of your post: MS didn't "establish itself"... they
did some kind of shady move with IBM to have their OS pre-installed in
OEM computers for a good few years, until it was irreversible. I know american folks (coming from "the land of opportunity and the free and brave), see these 'corporate moves' as not so much as "shady", but you gotta give that that's not quite "squeaky clean"...
Yeah.. I was surprised he also said he thought about 90% of BBSes had
disappeared in 1993, which seems pretty early to me. The BBS scene was
Here, when we moved from Jackson to Memphis, there were still SEVERAL BBS's running! I paid for a dial up shell account to use for telnet and such, before we migrated to AOL for 'the web.' But even then BBS's were still popular. This was 93-94 or so.
Remember bloatware? You'd buy that $300 Packard Bell or HP machine,
and it woud be preinstalled with a TON of stuff that you had to
delete to get system space and processing back. I found out that
the companies PAID to have their stuff installed, and that's how
they could sell the PC's so cheaply.
JIMMY ANDERSON (21:2/127) wrote to Nightfox <=-
Here, when we moved from Jackson to Memphis, there were still
SEVERAL BBS's running! I paid for a dial up shell account to
use for telnet and such, before we migrated to AOL for 'the
web.' But even then BBS's were still popular. This was 93-94
or so.
Nightfox wrote to Jimmy Anderson <=-
Where I am, I'd say there were more than just 'several' BBSes still running in 1993. I didn't even start running my BBS until 1994, and I think there were still a lot of BBSes in my area at that time. Mine
got plenty of callers.. I think it was around 1997 or so when BBS
usage in my area started to drop off, and it seemed to drop off fairly quickly. I took my BBS down in 2000 because it was rarely getting any callers anymore.
What I think is interesting is that I think my current BBS now gets
more use than my original BBS was getting in 2000..
Malvinas wrote to Jimmy Anderson <=-
Remember bloatware? You'd buy that $300 Packard Bell or HP machine,
and it woud be preinstalled with a TON of stuff that you had to
delete to get system space and processing back. I found out that
the companies PAID to have their stuff installed, and that's how
they could sell the PC's so cheaply.
Thing is, you could delete those "tools and utils", and still be able
to use the machine. Talk about the OS... what do you do if you wipe out your HD and have no OS to install, to replace it. Having an agreement
with the OEMs to have *your* OS pre installed and not let people find whatever OS they'd like... I think it was anything but "nice".
Utopian Galt wrote to Jimmy Anderson <=-
JIMMY ANDERSON (21:2/127) wrote to Nightfox <=-
Here, when we moved from Jackson to Memphis, there were still
SEVERAL BBS's running! I paid for a dial up shell account to
use for telnet and such, before we migrated to AOL for 'the
web.' But even then BBS's were still popular. This was 93-94
or so.
They started to die out when I graduated from high school in 1997.
People who started to go to college ended up killing off their bbses.
I was the only long term bbs in my area for another decade before i stopped paying for the modem line.
Agreed... At least now there are usually restore files on the hard
drive. :)
Malvinas wrote to Jimmy Anderson <=-
Agreed... At least now there are usually restore files on the hard
drive. :)
And "live" pendrive .iso files, that let you "try before install" different OSs and distros... something that was still the stuff of
dreams in the first half of the 80s.
Sysop: | smooth0401 |
---|---|
Location: | New Providence, NJ |
Users: | 5 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 21:38:03 |
Calls: | 311 |
Files: | 595 |
D/L today: |
6 files (5,521K bytes) |
Messages: | 50,308 |